Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 8 | Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

Fig. 8

From: Extracellular vesicle digital scoring assay for assessment of treatment responses in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Fig. 8

Case study of post-Tx recurrence in six HCC patients with false negative cross-sectional imaging assessment and positive HCC EV TR Score readouts. A swimmer plot illustrates the clinical histories of 6 HCC patients who exhibited discrepancies between their cross-sectional imaging assessment and HCC EV TR Score readouts. Each horizontal bar represents an individual patient's timeline from the initial Tx date (x-axis) to post-Tx recurrence based on cross-sectional imaging assessment. Blue triangles indicate the time points of initial cross-sectional imaging. Based on the LR-TR algorithm, all patients were classified as post-Tx nonviable HCC. Yet, their HCC EV TR Scores were above the optimal cutoff of 0.76, suggesting post-Tx viable status. Subsequent follow-up imaging confirmed the presence of viable lesions, consistent with the prediction by HCC EV TR Scores. TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TARE, transarterial radioembolization; Tx, treatment

Back to article page